Cycling Crossrail must be supported, warts and all

It is, according to sources in Transport for London, an out and out war. The battleground is the plan for Crossrail for cycles announced by Boris Johnson recently which involves two clear mostly segregated routes for cyclists, one N –S, the other, longer, that is E –W. Already, the forces of darkness are massing on the hilltops to launch an all out assault. They must be stopped.

Broadly, one route will go from just north of Elephant & Castle through to Farringdon and over a radically redesigned Blackfriars Bridge. The other goes from Tower Hill along the Embankment, through Parliament Square and then up to Hyde Park Corner, through Hyde Park and then past Paddington. There is then a rather controversial idea to route cyclists up to the Westway which will then have part segregated

As ever, the designs are not perfect. There are places where clearly there is still the potential for conflict between cars and cyclists, and many of the cycle paths are bi-directional which, by definition, means there might be difficulty accessing them.

However – and this is a big however – it is imperative that cycling groups across London get behind the scheme. Yes, we know that Boris has put it forward as a cynical ploy to try to push his pretty non-existent green credentials. Yes, we know that Boris’s first effort at superhighways was a disaster as illustrated by the deaths at the Bow Roundabout.

This, though, is on a different scale. It will show Londoners – and indeed the world – that Transport for London is serious about cycling and that the London Cycling Campaign’s slogan of Space for Cycling is bearing fruit.

There’s no doubt that these plans are radical and represent a step change from anything even suggested before. I personally have doubts about whether it is sensible or desirable to create a cycle lane along Westway, instead of as a kind of two fingers to the people who built this attempt at turning London into a urban motorway nightmare.

The radical nature of the scheme explains why it is already being attacked by commercial interests with no interest in making the city a better place to live and travel in.

As the excellent Cyclists in the City blog put it, ‘masters of the universe’ are concerned that their car journeys to Heathrow will take longer (I was once told by a City source that bankers were only interested in a transport system that could deliver rapid road journeys between the City and Heathrow, preferably on a motorway). Predictably the RAC Foundation has got in on the act, worried that space is being taken away from car use, and even London First has got in on the act.

However, there are also a lot of business supporters. They recognise that cycling is good for many businesses. People on bikes have easy access to high streets and therefore are likely to spend money locally. This has been demonstrated time and again, and yet Neanderthal business interests will clearly oppose this scheme all the way through.

That is why all those with an interest in making London safer for cyclists, which brings benefits to other people in the city too, must be prepared to come our publicly in support of the scheme. Already various groups have started to organise. London Cycling Campaign has created an online form to show your support and group called Cycling Works is encouraging people to put pressure on their employers.

So let’s forget our scepticism, our concerns about details and our arguments about segregation versus cycle paths on highways (a row, incidentally, which according to the new book by Carlton Reid, Roads were not made for Cars has being going on since the 1930s), and get behind the Crossrail for bikes.

 

 

  • IsambardBrunel

    Good piece, but you give credit to LCC for the “Space for Cycling” slogan which is in fact a national campaign group run jointly by cyclenation – a federation of local cycling campaign groups and the CTC (cycle touring club). So there is a world beyond London after all.

  • Jitensha Oni

    I see history is being rewritten already – there must be something to this Crossrail for Bikes thing. ‘Space for Cycling’ as a slogan indeed signifies a joint campaign group, but it’s aim is to take the London (and largely LCC generated) Space4Cycling campaign nationwide. Space4Cycling pre-dates Space for Cycling.

    Regarding Christian Wolmar’s article, I’m actually fascinated by how the current anti-campaigns are made up of almost exactly the same groups using exactly the same arguments against the superhighways as they did against the congestion charge. I don’t know whether or not the charge achieved its aims: the debate and analysis is the most horrendous unscientific labyrinthine mess it’s been my misfortune to try and get to grips with – but hey! That appears to be the normal standard round London. Might is right. With the charge, of course, Ken’s might won out. Will Boris’s?

    I agree with Christian Wolmar though, London needs dragging into the 21st century. It is becoming a museum of the 20th century, and to retain the interest of the billionaires it needs to stay current. That includes protected bike lanes. All a bit cynical I know, but there’s more than one way etc.

  • Paul Holt

    It is arguable that London is not a museum of the 20th century but a museum of the Romans, with the layout little changed since those days. Sir Christopher Wren famously tried (and failed) to create a modern city in the 17th Century.

  • IL train

    I agree withh Mister IsmabardBurned, thanks for shring it.

    רכבת ישראל לוח זמנים
    http://רכבת-ישראל.org.il/

Shares