Whatever happened to the fuel protests? Or rather didn’t. What a wonderful damp squib they were, attracting fewer people than the average village Women’s Institute annual general meeting. What a contrast with 2000.
Was it the juxtaposition of the protests with the climate change talks in Bali, which made people too embarrassed to come out to support them. I doubt it. It was probably a combination of cold weather, Christmas and general apathy, but nevertheless the failure should be celebrated. Certainly it made for some seasonal cheer.
It would be comforting to think that this will embolden politicians and that ministers will realise that it is now possible to implement policies that may not be opposed by the AA and the RAC, let alone Captain Gatso. There would be a neat symmetry if, just as the fuel protests of 2000 led to the scrapping of any policies that even begun to limit the environmental damage caused by transport, then the failure of the 2007 protests would have the opposite effect.
Fat chance. There is, so far, no sign that ministers are considering reimposing the fuel tax escalator, and national road charging seems to have slipped off the agenda faster than cars have gone off the road in the recent icy conditions. If one had to score the present government’s policy on climate change out of a hundred, it would be difficult to mark them into double figures.
Blog fuel protests failure
Monday, 17 December 2007
posted by Christian Wolmar at 07:21
2 Comments:
Good to see the pro-environment message get into press coverage this time, which didn't happen in 2000. The Campaign for Better Transport's myths of higher motoring costs publicity is getting noticed. On road pricing, looks like Manchester's plan is falling apart as spineless councillors in some boroughs are opposing it. Surely this is what the government wanted all along-they can blame the local councils for not agreeing a plan and then deny them transport investment funds.
Chris Packham
The only way such schemes can work is if there is demonstrable local support for them rather than being imposed by Whitehall. So I don't actually disagree with the idea of local authorities making the decision (as they did in London).
The situation in other urban areas is somewhat different to London - congestion just isn't on the same scale. Of course it eventually will be as car ownership and usage rises.